Composite vs Wood Decking: Which Pays for Itself quicker?

Composite vs Wood Decking: Which Pays for Itself quicker?

Wood decking, especially natural wood, has been used by homeowners and business owners alike to add beauty and value to their properties for many years. Typically, wood decking costs less than composite decking at the time of purchase because it can be purchased in a variety of different sizes and thicknesses from multiple manufacturers whereas composite decking usually comes in one pre-selected color and thickness from the manufacturer. However, although the initial cost of wood is less, composite usually ends up paying for itself within 2-3 years when including the cost of annual maintenance.

 

Pro & Con of Composites

Before we dive into whether bamboo is better than composite, let’s look at each material. Those can include polyethylene, polypropylene, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Some companies may even mix different types in an effort to keep costs down. komposittrall balkong tends to be more expensive than wood but offers longer life spans, making it easier on your wallet over time.

 The biggest problem with composite decking has nothing to do with its physical properties; it’s how quickly it goes out of style. Composite manufacturers change their colors every year, which means you’ll need to replace your deck every few years just so it matches your home’s exterior paint color scheme. On top of that, composite decking will fade faster than wood because there are no natural pigments in composites like there are in woods like cedar and redwood.

Pros & Cons of Wood

Pros & Cons of Wood

The initial cost of wood decking is significantly cheaper than composite. However, composite will pay off within a few years when including maintenance costs over time. On top of that, composites tend to resist heat better, which makes them ideal in warmer climates or when exposed to direct sunlight. Finally, all-wood decks require more work and attention, as they’re subject to insect and plant damage from moisture or stray splinters left behind by bare feet.

Cost Analysis

If you’re looking to build a new deck in your backyard, composite might be a good option. Although it costs more upfront than traditional wood decking, it’s likely to pay for itself within a couple of years because composite decks don’t require as much annual maintenance.  

Maintenance Comparison

Maintenance Comparison

Composite decking can sometimes be a bit more expensive to install initially, but it saves money in maintenance costs over time. Composite does not splinter or warp like wood and is also unaffected by climate changes. In addition, composite decking lasts significantly longer than its counterparts—upwards of 25 years as opposed to only 10 years with traditional lumber. The lifespan of composite makes it much less costly in the long run because you won’t need to replace your deck as often.

 

How Long do Decks Last

Decks made from composite materials, such as bamboo or plastic, will often last more than twice as long as decks constructed using wood. komposittrall inspiration contains no organic material and usually requires little or no annual maintenance—just a quick cleaning every few weeks to remove surface grime and prevent mold or mildew. For most homeowners in cold climates, composite decking is a good choice because it doesn’t require sanding, staining or sealing.

 

Conclusion

So, is bamboo decking going to save you money in maintenance costs over composite? Well, that depends. I think it boils down to two things: how quickly your deck will wear out and what you’re willing to put up with.

Read more: Which Garden Fence is Right for You?

contributor

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.